In the Ins of the Outs of Crowdsourcing

In tracking shifts across the world and across industries, the rise of Crowdsourcing continues to unleash some amazing innovations in products and services. Importantly it is exposing the capability gaps that even large organisations have. Simply put, the ‘crowd’ is always going to be bigger than your business or organisation. But to tap that latent capability effectively requires some mental (and occasionally structural) shifts. Here’s a few ideas you can jump onto today:

 

To garner any lasting benefits from Crowdsourcing, going ‘out there’ needs internal trust.  Without that trust much energy will be expended by a few people, only to see potentially business changing ideas fall on to infertile soil. There are some key things that your organisation must understand when it moves toward tapping the crowd.

Bringing ideas in from the out needs a filtering process

1. All ideas are good, some are more good than others. 

This means that you must have a formal acknowledgement system in place as in “thanks for your idea, there’s some good merit in it and we might be able to apply it at some point but not right now”

Other ideas need a more direct response “thanks for your idea, at the moment we can’t see a place for it in our existing portfolio”

And some ideas require you to make a direct phone call or note of thanks to start a more involved conversations and relationship. These would usually be ideas that have immediate applicability. Regardless of the immediate benefits or otherwise, building a relationship of respect and trust requires you to acknowledge the thinking and input of people from the crowd. As many organizations have discovered to their horror – crowds talk and negative talk can suddenly become a public relations disaster. You must treat your Crowd like any other valued member of your organisation’s team.

2. Crowd sourcing offers organisations like yours a chance to build a testbed case.

It is an opportunity to try concepts out that crowd has provided to you.  There are 2 main ways I recommend:

A) try a crowd sourced idea in a safe area that has a low-cost of resources and process change or

B) try a crowd sourced idea with one of your organisation’s intractable problems.

In the 1st idea you are looking to apply the concept where you have low-cost of people and low-cost process.  With low-cost of people this includes time, money, and available support to enact the idea that’s been brought in from the outside.  The challenge for organisations is automatically jumping to action on any new crowdsourced idea that looks interesting which is why the filtering process is critical.  Instead your organisation must always balance the implementation of an idea with the Capabilities available to it.

With the 2nd approach, you utilise the Capabilities of the crowd to generate solutions to problems that you have been unable to solve yourself.  The outstanding example of the Foldit!  Community solving the enzyme challenge for HIV is one well-known impact of effective crowdsourcing.

So what key Crowdsourcing components are needed?

The initial phase requires your organisational management to accept the possibility of talking to the outside world.  Where crowdsourcing enables you to access a whole range of capabilities, it is often the internal barrier of approval to access the outside ideas, that prevents the full benefits of crowdsourcing being available to your organisation.

In my innovation workshops I usually discuss the idea of “permission to change”.  This is an explicit statement of intention within the organisation that enables people to pursue something different, in different ways, and for different outcomes.  Without that explicit permission to change, crowdsourcing initiatives will likely fail.  This is why utilising the ‘safe area’ is the easiest step for organisations to take in their crowdsourcing journey.

It is also useful to understand that very few organisations are starting from scratch.  If your organisation has outsourced any of its productive capacity and built a supply chain or network of relationships through that process, or in-sourced some capability through temporary and contractor hiring, it is likely you already have the key basic building blocks for moving towards a crowdsourcing approach.

In both instances, your organisation has established an ability to talk to the outside world and rely on the outside world to produce something you require.  The difference between crowdsourcing and normal reliance on a selected contractor or part of the supply chain, is that the crowd is much bigger, much wider and has much greater capability.  Because of that increased capacity, management of crowdsourcing can seem daunting at first, but there’s really no need for it to be any different than how you would approach a typical supplier arrangement.

So where to begin?

Take a thumb sketch view of your organisation’s ability to call for assistance, speak to, and relate with, the outside world.

Next, ensure that you have a ready platform that allows you to ask for and respond to ideas.  If you already have a social media platform, it is likely you have the skill sets you require to tap the ever growing capabilities of crowdsourcing.

Be clear on which approach you plan to take and ensure that you have the explicit ‘permission to change’ or ‘permission to crowdsource’ statements widely distributed and understood across your organisation.

Finally, set realistic expectations from your initial crowdsourcing endeavours.  You may hit a home run on your first attempt, however it is more likely that in the initial stages you will be building up your internal and external capability to understand how crowdsourcing can become a source of innovation, change and evolution for your business.

And one final word of caution: the crowd ‘outside’ probably thinks very differently from how you think – that difference is neither good nor bad, just different.  You will learn as much from the crowd, as the crowd can learn from you.  Your key challenge is to begin

Will a Change in Greens Leadership make the Nationals Redundant?

May 5, 2015

With the moderately surprising news that Christine Milne had decided to step out of her current political life, Dr Richard Di Natale moved into the driver’s seat for the Greens. And I flag that this spells trouble for the National Party because this shift, this change in voice and style, connected to similar passions, will…

Read More >

Why most Strategic Plans are little more than wish-lists

Apr 21, 2015

In fact I’ll go one step further and say that many Strategic Plans are DELIBERATE methods for NOT Progressing. In far too many organisations, the process of Strategic Planning is about compliance to a process of ‘having a plan’ and typically it has nothing to do with achievement of the outcomes listed in the Strategic…

Read More >

Why Battery Technology will force Power Companies to embrace domestic supply

Mar 11, 2015

Around Australia and parts of the world like the USA, some governments and especially many large scale power utilities, are pursuing a campaign to prevent domestic solar from being fed back into (sold to) the grid. I’m assuming that the (fundamentally flawed) thinking is that by denying additional energy production points, they’ll prop up or…

Read More >

Men, What Will Your Legacy Be?

Feb 23, 2015

I’m male. You may like to take that into consideration with the rest of what you read as, a) I’m part of the problem b) Whatever I say cannot, no matter how well intentioned, be in anyway able to represent women     I’m prompted to write this particular piece following on from the ABC’s…

Read More >

The Future of Energy

Feb 19, 2015

  On a day when The Age front page ran a story of mass disconnections of householders struggling to pay their domestic electricity bill, Futurist Marcus Barber and ABC Goulburn Murray’s Joseph Thomsen discuss the future of energy – what’s happening now, what are we going to see in the future and what can consumers…

Read More >

Eat OR Extract? You CANNOT do Both

Feb 5, 2015

With Farmland across NSW, Queensland, & the Northern Territory under pressure from the mining sector, the quality of discussion as to which land use is of best outcome or most suitable seems to go astray. I’ve been flagging the ‘Eat’ OR ‘Extract’ challenge for a few years now and this radio interview is one example…

Read More >

2015 will be the International Year of Battery Technology

Dec 30, 2014

For the past few years I’ve decided to declare each year to be something I think the world needs or is likely to see. It’s not so much about the prediction but more about the likely focus that will benefit the world. So I’m declaring this year to be the International Year of Battery Technology…

Read More >

Why Uber is not part of the Sharing Economy

Dec 17, 2014

I keep reading posts that Uber is an example of the ‘sharing economy’, the one in which people freely share what they have with others. But it’s NOT – it is instead part of what I call the ‘Utilisation Economy’ which is about use of spare capacity. About 15 years ago I began writing about…

Read More >

Incumbent models are vulnerable to leapfrogging technology. Here’s why:

Nov 8, 2014

One of the reasons I founded The Australian Strategic Planning Institute was to ensure that high quality futures perspectives were included in the Strategic Planning process. Typically they were not which meant too many businesses and organisations were planning for futures that just would not exist as expected, meaning wasted resources and sometimes and marked…

Read More >

Down the Drain with a Four Minute Shower – redux

Oct 21, 2014

As Victorian edges its way into a new drought phase and plays catch up to other parts of the country, I’ve been pushed to remember an article I wrote about our then State Government’s push to get people to reduce the length of their showers. The Four Minute Shower was an attempt to highlight just…

Read More >