How to Stop Japanese Whaling in its Tracks
Whilst I appreciate the efforts that Greenpeace, Sea Shepherd and the various Australian Governments have given regarding their aims to have the Japanese cease their annual whale harvests, I’m not quite sure they are tackling the issue through the best means available.
Sure the confrontational approach of ramming ships, climbing aboard vessels, getting in the way of harpoons and all of that makes for great TV and dynamic press coverage. Who hasn’t thought ‘gee that’d be something I could get passionate about’ as you see the pint sized rubber duck take on a giant slice and dice whale factory in the middle of the ocean?
But the challenge with this approach is that whilst media sexy, it misses the glaring gap in the Japanese push for whaling. I’ll come to that a bit later.
First up though we have to consider just why the Japanese are so ‘passionate’ about whaling. I say ‘passionate’ because the number of Japanese who are in fact ‘passionate’ is quite small. Is it the historical factor? No – plenty of research shows that quite few Japanese eat whale meat, fewer still are aware of any historical links and there’s certainly little real evidence to support whaling by Japan along the lines of the Inuit peoples. So if it isn’t about history, how valid are the claims of scientific research? This is the multi-million dollar question that also provides the clue as to How to Stop Japanese Whaling in its Tracks. Without going into too much detail let me expose my own values and say ‘I don’t buy the scientifc research’ claims as anything other than a myth. There’s plenty of others who feel the same way, hence the anti-whaling ships hunting the Japanese whaling vessels this year and in past years.
So why then do the Japanese want to pursue whaling? The answer lies in economics, population growth and geography. Without putting it too simply, Japan lacks room. Because Japan lacks room it does not have the ability to farm cattle. That means it must import cattle and that means it spends money in places like Australia and the United States – countries with an abundance of room to grow cattle. If Japan wants to increase the protein consumption of its population it has but a handful of choices: Import beef/lamb etc which costs the Japanese economically; increase the amount of fish on the diet yet international fisheries are under extreme pressure (and the tastes of Japanese are evolving which means fish though dominant is no longer deemed sufficient); and increase chicken consumption (and also egg consumption) but in order to do that it has to import appropriate forms of feed stocks at a time when China is absorbing a goodly portion of the world’s grain output.
Which leads to the obvious conclusion: No room for cattle, fish stocks under pressure and no desire to increase imports at the same time as there exists a desire to increase the available amounts of protein means one thing – Farm the Oceans for Protein.
And one of the best sources for protein in massive amounts that is easy to ‘harvest’ is whale meat. The real reason the Japanese want to maintain and increase their whale numbers has nothing to do with scientific research and has everything to do with accessing cheap sources of protein. The Japanese wish to use the oceans as their ‘farms’ and to treat whales as their ‘cattle’. A low cost, self feeding, no maintenance farmland with the ship crews acting as the cowhands, the Antarctic ocean as their stockyards, and their ships acting as the slaughterhouse. And they get all of that for free, plundering a resource that belongs to the world for their own benefit.
So what can be done?
The answer to the challenge lies in the very reason Japans offer as to why they ‘whale’ – scientific research. We know it’s rubbish, the Japanese Government knows it’s rubbish; the Japanese whalers know it’s rubbish. So the answer to ‘How to Stop Japanese Whaling in its Tracks’ lies within the very heart of what it means to be Japanese:
‘Honour’.
The Japanese are big on ‘Honour’. REALLY BIG. In fact culturally it has been and continues to be a key driver in how they negotiate with the world and with each other. The need to save ‘kao’ (face) is critical. Attacking their ships does not allow them to save face and so they will rally against it. Boarding their ships only enables a relatively disinterested Japanese public to stand behind their own. Attacking them in whaling commissions also won’t do it – we know that because the loophole that is ‘scientific research’ was offered up because a total ban was not going to be approved or accepted.
What must happen for us to be able to Stop Japanese Whaling in its Tracks is to get the Japanese people to question the ‘honour’ of hiding behind ‘scientific research’ as the reason for whaling and bring their own pressue to bear on their Government.
And to do so, the place to start is to question the ability of Japanese Scientists. Which means the messages that are sent out work something like this:
- ‘Japanese Whaling Scientists are the worst and most inept scientists in the world. We know this because no where else do scientists make so many blunders, require so much base stock and make so many errors in the research process’
- ‘How stupid are Japanese Whaling Scientists? In other parts of the world we can harvest stems cells from scrapes of human tissue but in Japan they need not only whole whales, but thousands of them each year just to work out what whales eat’
- ‘Only the poorest of scientists would work for the whaling industry – how else could they do so little with so much?’
- ‘To be a whale scientist in Japan is to have no honour – how else could they hide behind the facade?’
You get the picture. By and large Japan has produced some of the smartest and greatest scientists in the world and still do. But to have all of Japan’s scientists tarred with the brush of ineptitude, stupidity and lack of honour would be something that culturally would be too painful for the Japanese community to bear. In a very short time the facade of scientific research would end and that is How to Stop Japanese Whaling in its Tracks.
With the moderately surprising news that Christine Milne had decided to step out of her current political life, Dr Richard Di Natale moved into the driver’s seat for the Greens. And I flag that this spells trouble for the National Party because this shift, this change in voice and style, connected to similar passions, will…
Read More >In fact I’ll go one step further and say that many Strategic Plans are DELIBERATE methods for NOT Progressing. In far too many organisations, the process of Strategic Planning is about compliance to a process of ‘having a plan’ and typically it has nothing to do with achievement of the outcomes listed in the Strategic…
Read More >Around Australia and parts of the world like the USA, some governments and especially many large scale power utilities, are pursuing a campaign to prevent domestic solar from being fed back into (sold to) the grid. I’m assuming that the (fundamentally flawed) thinking is that by denying additional energy production points, they’ll prop up or…
Read More >I’m male. You may like to take that into consideration with the rest of what you read as, a) I’m part of the problem b) Whatever I say cannot, no matter how well intentioned, be in anyway able to represent women I’m prompted to write this particular piece following on from the ABC’s…
Read More >On a day when The Age front page ran a story of mass disconnections of householders struggling to pay their domestic electricity bill, Futurist Marcus Barber and ABC Goulburn Murray’s Joseph Thomsen discuss the future of energy – what’s happening now, what are we going to see in the future and what can consumers…
Read More >With Farmland across NSW, Queensland, & the Northern Territory under pressure from the mining sector, the quality of discussion as to which land use is of best outcome or most suitable seems to go astray. I’ve been flagging the ‘Eat’ OR ‘Extract’ challenge for a few years now and this radio interview is one example…
Read More >For the past few years I’ve decided to declare each year to be something I think the world needs or is likely to see. It’s not so much about the prediction but more about the likely focus that will benefit the world. So I’m declaring this year to be the International Year of Battery Technology…
Read More >I keep reading posts that Uber is an example of the ‘sharing economy’, the one in which people freely share what they have with others. But it’s NOT – it is instead part of what I call the ‘Utilisation Economy’ which is about use of spare capacity. About 15 years ago I began writing about…
Read More >One of the reasons I founded The Australian Strategic Planning Institute was to ensure that high quality futures perspectives were included in the Strategic Planning process. Typically they were not which meant too many businesses and organisations were planning for futures that just would not exist as expected, meaning wasted resources and sometimes and marked…
Read More >As Victorian edges its way into a new drought phase and plays catch up to other parts of the country, I’ve been pushed to remember an article I wrote about our then State Government’s push to get people to reduce the length of their showers. The Four Minute Shower was an attempt to highlight just…
Read More >