Why Uber is not part of the Sharing Economy
I keep reading posts that Uber is an example of the ‘sharing economy’, the one in which people freely share what they have with others. But it’s NOT – it is instead part of what I call the ‘Utilisation Economy’ which is about use of spare capacity. About 15 years ago I began writing about the emerging generations being more likely focused on ‘Access to’, rather than ‘ownership of’, products and services and this was a reason why big ticket items were of less appeal. Access to was the early sign of the sharing economy which works more like this – if I can borrow a friend’s camera/car/house/surfboard why do I need to buy one?
And as the sharing economy evolved its offerings, the capitalist view also met it coming in the other direction for a question was always hanging about: ‘how can we monetise this idea?’ And Uber therefore is fundamentally NOT about sharing and it IS about Utilisation. What the Utilisation economy opens up for the sharing economy is the money flow. Sharing is sharing. It’s FREE. This article about stickers on letterboxes is a true example of the sharing economy. Utilisation is about underused capacity that can be offered for a small price and it is where both consumer and provider win – the consumer through access to a need at a typically lower cost and the provider getting something (less) for what would otherwise go to waste.
The formalisation of the Utilisation Economy is the change in business models that have existed in part at an informal level for some time. In supermarkets for instance, food nearing its expiry date is often marked down substantially to encourage a purchase – the risk of a non sale is a total loss of sale value and so a small purchase price is better than none. Airlines will often dump seats onto the market at a bare cost to help fill a plane (though more often now a days the tendency is to cancel flights at short notice and force consumers onto a plane flight they did not want, with no recourse).
In my work with a wide number of manufacturers I encourage the development of the Utilisation Economy approach by opening up spare warehousing space to partners or even providing access to machinery or equipment during quiet times or after hours so that they can maximise payback on capital investment.
Just recently Uber has copped some significant global PR flak for what might be described as price gouging during the Sydney seige wherein a man with a history of domestic violence held almost 20 people at gunpoint for almost a day. That incident took place in central Sydney and if you know anything about Sydney you know it can be an awfully difficult place to navigate. Uber uses an algorithm that automatically increases prices during periods of high demand aimed to (also) increase incentives for providers to make themselves available. And during the crisis it did just that as this article on Triple Pundit explains.
The reason the PR has been so bad is because people think that Uber is (and Uber has been happy to align with) part of the sharing economy and therefore is held to higher ethical standards than the arguably ‘morally bankrupt’ for profit economy players. But this is misguided because Uber is first and foremost about capacity utilisation. It’s a Utilisation Economy player, not a sharing economy player. It brings together a consumer need with existing spare capacity at a fee acceptable to everyone. And let’s be clear, the concert industry, airline industry, hotel industry, petroleum and many many others are more than happy to gouge (sorry) ‘utilise’ supply and demand pricing structures to maximise revenues. Uber is just like them except it’s not.
With no capital outlay, ownership of plant, equipment or vehicles of its own, Uber is not the same kind of bricks and mortar business. And because it doesn’t do what it does for free, it’s also NOT part of the Sharing Economy. Instead it fits in the world between the two – it is part of the Utilisation Economy and it is a business model that we are going to see much more of in the future. The trucking industry already use this with ‘backloading’ successfully for years so get used to it. Even if some states or countries try to legislate it out of existence, the Lyfts and Ubers of this world will keep appearing. They may be smaller, less formal or less well known, but they’ll have a loyal band of consumers and providers who see the significant value in utilsing spare capacity.
The Utilisation Economy is here and it’s growing. Just don’t confuse it with the Sharing Economy
The MP3 file below captures part two of our chat looking at the Future of Sex. Picking up on the theme of new technology that popped up towards the end of our first discussion in week one, here we move onto haptics and holographics and the extension of that technology from beyond the bedroom and…
Read More >Who’s Been Sleeping In My House? is a new Australian series presented by archaeologist Adam Ford that looks at the stories behind some of our old homes. Adam is the man behind the recent ‘Ned Kelly’ dig among other great archaeology finds here in Australia and the UK. As a futurist I’m always interested in…
Read More >The Association of Professional Futures is holding its first Virtual Gathering, following the sun from Europe, across North America and finishing in the Australia pacific zone. It kicks off tomorrow and links to the program and registration (it’s only $45 for guests for a program featuring some of the worlds most prominent futurists) You…
Read More >I join Vicki Kerrigan on ABC Darwin radio where we continue our discussion about the future of sex. We consider three main areas in this session – smart phone applications; remote relationships and the combination of haptics and holographics as one the emerging means by which we’ll maintain physical contact. You can download the…
Read More >In this chat with Vicki Kerrigan on radio ABC Darwin we discuss the future of sex. This is the first of potentially three conversations where we look at the increasing reach of technology way beyond current online match making sites, the social pressures driving the use of technology as well as the use of technology…
Read More >There’s been a bit of discussion in recent months about a softening housing market around Australia but I wonder how much of it is more indicative of unrealistic expectations on behalf of sellers? In futures work we think in terms of Assumptions and Expectations and aim to test our understanding and so I offer this…
Read More >Unfortunately it looks like my main email address has been hijacked and has been used to send out a series of spam emails. I’d like to apologise to anyone who has received some junk email purporting to come from ‘desiredfutures’ with a series of html links asking you to go and have a look. You…
Read More >Given the amount of plastic swimming in our oceans and rivers and the volume littering our land, the NT Government is aiming to introduce compulsory returns legislation on soft-drink bottles (as happens in South Australia), something that has apparently raised the ire of bottler, Coca Cola. Although they’ve recently backed away from their initial statement…
Read More >Deciphering the hype from reality with regard to drug use can be a challenge for most of us. Professor David Nutt in the UK has given me permission to post a link to the paper he has co-authored with Ruth Weissenborn that looks at the reality of a comparison of harm caused by two common…
Read More >Vicki Kerrigan and I finished off our discussion about the Future of Clothing on ABC Darwin yesterday. We discussed invisibility style cloaks, singlets that monitor your heart rate and stress levels, runners that capture electricity to power your wearable electronics and a few philosophical questions regarding our ability to deal with stress. The file…
Read More >