When Organisational Visions are Statements of Delusion

For over a decade I worked with organisations in for profit, not for profit and government sectors. I’ve advised organisations in Europe, North America, Asia and beyond. Some organisations have been multi nationals, long standing, privately owned, publicly held, socially aware, profit focused and more. I’ve managed million dollar portfolios and client accounts of just one. I’ve been engaged for a mere hour up to projects lasting a number of years. And of all areas of operation, I’ve discovered just one area that connects all organisational types – the Organisation’s Vision

If you’ve followed any of the stories on LinkedIn, HBR, Success et al and beyond, there’s a fair chance that you’ve read about the ‘importance of a Vision’ or ‘Why the Leader’s Vision is paramount’ and ‘How to get others to follow your Vision’ and so on. It’d be fair to conclude that, based on the sheer volume of stories that discuss leadership and business results and organisational culture and the like, that everyone pretty much has the idea of Vision bedded down to a fine art.

So now, as a specialist assisting organisations to make better decisions about their future, allow me to offer the following thought for your consideration and cogitation:
Most Organisational Visions are Statements of Delusion

Please believe me when I say that in a number of cases with this assessment, I’m being kind.

Thankfully the situation is not irretrievable. Far from it. And the change required from delusion to enlightenment is a discipline that few organisations are aware is required. It is NOT that the Vision is not encased in a sphere of positive intent – most organisations I have worked with and for truly did want to achieve great things. The leadership team really did want to set the bar high, to leave a legacy of greatness.

Sadly, the vast majority will come no where near achieving the Vision they have set, not for lack of desire, but for lack of process. And lacking in an effective process, the Organisational Vision is little more than a statement of delusion.

Here then is the key for ensuring a Vision is Outcome focused, not dreaming focused.
1) If your Vision has been created top-down, expect ongoing difficulty with achieving it. Top down Visions are fine, but they are NOT your Organisation’s Vision, they’re YOURS. Until you can show your employees how achieving YOUR Vision will help them to achieve THEIR Vision, you are kidding yourself if you believe that your Vision will help drive performance or change culture.

2) If the Organisational Vision is not referred to at every meeting, you aren’t keeping the focus on the final desired destination.

3) If your Vision contains elements that you ALREADY have, then it is no longer a ‘Vision’. Once achieved, your Vision should change to something you want, not something you have.

4) The second biggest cause of delusion with Organisational Visions is a failure to specifically identify the capabilities required to deal with those barriers/obstacles/opportunities that are between you and your Vision. If you do not have the required capabilities you can NEVER achieve your Vision and it is delusional to think otherwise. Start identifying and building the capabilities you need

5) If your Vision does NOT have a stated end date, you’re engaged in delusion. This is the area I get the biggest push back from others in my field and often from senior management teams and boards. And let me tell you this – drawing a line in the sand, fixing an ‘end date’ is the spark that will set you on your way. Without an end date you’ll drift aimlessly and your organisation will lack accountability – you’ll be deluded into thinking you are making progress

So there you have it. The challenge is not insurmountable and it does require discipline. It is likely you DO have the capabilities to ensure your Organisational Vision can pull you forward, can drive results, can enthuse the workplace. And the process is what is needed to maximise the value of your Organisational Vision. Merely having one without the discipline to attainment, is delusion.

The Future of Retail has landed.

Mar 6, 2013

As co presenter of the ‘Future Matters’ series with the National Geographic Channel back in 2004, I discussed the idea of Rapid Prototyping or 3D Printing. At that stage, 3D printers were like very large office photocopiers and the better ones had starting prices of around $150,000. I stated that in the near future, people…

Read More >

In the Ins of the Outs of Crowdsourcing

Feb 27, 2013

In tracking shifts across the world and across industries, the rise of Crowdsourcing continues to unleash some amazing innovations in products and services. Importantly it is exposing the capability gaps that even large organisations have. Simply put, the ‘crowd’ is always going to be bigger than your business or organisation. But to tap that latent…

Read More >

Can the Northern Territory beat the Drink ‘Bully Boys’?

Feb 19, 2013

Allow me to flag my bias from the outset – I’m tinged green. My shade of green recognises that my actions can contribute to a cleaner or more polluted world and that overall, I’d prefer the cleaner version. There’s a huge amount of data that shows that as a species we haven’t been looking after…

Read More >

The Future of Manufacturing is Upon us

Jan 31, 2013

The burgeoning shift in the manufacturing sector has been coming for a touch over a decade and has, I would suggest, now reached your front gate. A whole confluence of factors that include 3D printing, Crowdsourcing, home engineering and freescale Idea Generation leveraging social funding approaches means that EVERY single aspect of manufacturing as we…

Read More >

Ten Trends Shaping Government Today

Jan 24, 2013

Futurist Jack Uldrich has posted an item to his website looking at Ten Trends shaping Government today. Although each item is arguable and may be context specific depending on ‘which’ Government you’re looking at, it’s a good overall take suggesting things to do with data, the interenet, crowdsourcing and the like. However I think Jack…

Read More >

Should we really keep Politicians away from Scientists?

Jan 22, 2013

Sir Paul Nurse has ‘weight’ when it comes to science. His position is the head of The Royal Society in the United Kingdom and in an address in Melbourne he suggested that we need to keep politicians away from scientists: “It also emphasises the need to keep the science as far as is possible from…

Read More >

2013 will be the International Year of Crowdsourcing

Dec 30, 2012

I’ve been thinking long and hard about what to call 2013. After saying 2011 would need to be the International Year of Resilience (much still needed) and 2012 the International Year of Problem Solving I’m thinking now that Crowdsourcing (the idea of seeking assistance beyond your own capabilities from the ‘crowd’ often through social media)…

Read More >

Five Emergent Ideas for 2013 you won’t find on any ‘Trends for 2013’ list (just yet)

Dec 19, 2012

There’s lots of talk about ‘next big things for 2013’ right now, just as there has been in past years. Rather than join the cadre of prognosticators, trend experts and (not so) disguised salespeople laying claim to knowing about what ‘will’ be for the coming 12 months, I offer an alternative approach – here’s five…

Read More >

Does the Mayan Calendar recommend opening your Christmas present early?

Dec 16, 2012

Here it comes, the 21st of December 2012 – the last known recorded date on the Mayan Calendar and for years people have wondered why the Mayans never got around to extending beyond 2012. What did the Mayans know that we didn’t and should we be thinking about opening our Christmas presents early this year?…

Read More >

Five Degrees Hotter? A quick reality check

Dec 9, 2012

As a Strategic Futurist I love a good scenario like the rest of us in the futures community. And where I choose to diverge from many in my field is in the pragmatic applications of futures and foresight thinking. Scenarios left as ‘what ifs…?’ are at best, theoretical. All of my clients and most of…

Read More >