Time to combine Life Cycle design & penalties for environmental waste to solve a ballooning problem
Organisations like CleanUp Australia and Take3.org have (along with many others) taken a leading role at identifying and removing waste that has entered our environment. Their efforts are fantastic yet have one clear problem – they rely on volunteers to clean up the mess of others, after the fact – it’s a ‘playing catch-up’ strategy. So I’m thinking that the time is now right to use the ‘end of life-cycle’ product design approach to put the onus on product manufacturers to lift their game.
I’ve been particularly inspired by two recent images that landed on my desktop. One is of a pile of cigarette butts in a carpark at the Townsville Hospital (how’s that for Irony!) and the other was of the (mainly) plastic/soft drink related rubbish collected on Bondi beach among others (find those images here). Here’s what we know really well – when you put the emphasis of product returns back onto the producer, they change their models of behaviour and often, use product designs to do so.
So what we need right now is a $1 per cigarette butt penalty to be applied to makers of cigarettes for any of their butts collected from parks, railway stations, beaches etc. We know that cigarette companies will be keen to do this because they’re wanting to ensure they can brand their cigarettes – so now EVERY butt will have their name clearly stamped on it.
And let’s extend the idea to drink containers whilst we are at it. We all know it’s been working in South Australia for years, we all know NT is bringing it in but has had a massive rejection by Coca-Cola threatening legal action (though I think that is because Coca-Cola are trying to bring in their own version of plastic and don’t want supplies of existing plastic to come back online – don’t quote me, just a thought). So let’s say, oh, $1 per plastic container collected in a local Council precint. How quick do you think drink makers will embrace the idea of a 10c deposit scheme then?
And next, TV’s (say $100 per dumped TV) PC’s ($100)
How quickly will product designs focus on end of lifecycle as the penalty invoices start rolling in?
Or is it? …Over the past six years, the mainstream media polls have consistently shown the Liberal Party /National Party Coalition as well ahead of the Australian Labor Party. Those polls turned out to be wrong last time around when Tony Abbott failed to get enough of the vote to defeat Julia Gillard. Or should…
Read More >In my view ALL futures thinking about ‘big issues’ starts with futures thinking about personal issues. The idea that we take for granted the way our lives operate has for millennia been shown to be a high risk assumption. From the food we eat, to where we live, to products we use (and how we…
Read More >What you look at, how you look at it and where you find your information are critical elements for developing far more effective strategy. Futures work is about removing the organisational blinkers to increase awareness of risks and emerging opportunities often through Environmental Scanning (ES). ES comes in all sorts of guises and the key…
Read More >How do you innovate? Where do you innovate? Why do you innovate? How do I start innovating? These and a truckload of other similar questions are often tied to the idea that innovation is the silver bullet or panacea to mediocrity in organisations. And maybe it is. There’s a whole raft of ways in which…
Read More >From an organisational perspective it is pretty common for senior managers to spend significant energy considering when to upgrade plant and equipment, be it machinery, vehicles or IT infrastructure. The upgrades can occur on the run (in response to a surge in demand for instance), as a result of necessity (say as a result of…
Read More >If you’ve seen me speak before you already know I take a provocative stance when it comes to areas like personnel development, training and recruitment. Clients also know that once we’ve opened the door to thinking differently, they’re guided through some significant ‘of course’ moments in terms of how they approach developing their people and…
Read More >I flag from the outset that I haven’t been a regular readers of newspapers for almost a decade, only slightly less than my giving up on mainstream TV News shows. As such you should take this with a grain of salt, coming as it does from someone who reads maybe a paper a week and…
Read More >In the search for fuels and energy sources that act as a replacement to Oil, there’s much hype and claims that need to be tested. In much the same as claims about carbon capture technology being built onto existing coal fired power stations seem to lack both viability and credibility (in my view), the same…
Read More >Every day people in positions of ‘opinion authority’ make choices about what ‘opinions’ they will offer on a whole array of subjects. And it would be fair to say that over the past five years or so, many of those ‘opinion authorities’ have been significantly negative on Australia’s manufacturing sector. There’s no doubt that the…
Read More >As a futurist spending much of my time assessing emerging developments and their implications across an array of industry sectors, I am frequently asked for a view on ‘consumer trends’. Common questions are ‘what will consumers want in the future?’ ‘Does our product (service) have a place?’ ‘What is driving consumer behaviour?’ ‘How can we…
Read More >