Leading with One Hand Tied behind Your Back
There’s a few problems with the successful leadership lists that bounce their way around the internet. In my opinion they lack context – the reality check that only comes by having a full appreciation of an individual organisation’s particular circumstances. Unfortunately many of these lists of ‘required leadership behaviours’ offer shallow quick fix advice that fails to address the difficulties of decision making in the real world
So can anything be done about it? You bet and my suggestions are contained below. As always I’d be happy to have feedback or extra tips you think might be useful to consider
When it comes to thoughts on ‘leadership’ or ‘Leadership’ there’s a myriad of excellent and some less so articles to guide the soon to be, want to be, is currently, ‘leader’.
There’s thoughts about habits; thoughts about style; thoughts about followers; thoughts about command; thoughts about control; thoughts about engagement. You’ll find conversations about culture; approaches of different sexes, ages and industries. In fact there’s so many articles on Leadership that you could almost write a book about the subject.
ahem. An element consistently missing in these articles (or I might say ‘lacking’) is what I suggest is the ‘real world context’ of leadership which I’ve framed as ‘leading with one hand tied behind your back’. Instead most articles that offer the ‘top five ideas of successful this’ or the ‘key stages of powerful that’ seem to by default, assume that the choice to take on board the ideas suggested is a fait accompli.
Simply stated, too many article on Leadership ignore context for action.
In my many hundreds of contacts with Leaders from CEOs and Boards through to Managing Directors; Executive Officers and senior Management personnel there is just ONE common challenge that is faced across all industries and organisational sizes – how to steer the organisation when constraints exist.
These ‘constraints’, be they a lack of suitable personnel, financial resources, increased competition, changing consumer demands, adjustments to legislative or compliance laws, market access provisions and cash-flow (among many others) are the real life challenges that in effect, see the vast majority of those in an organisational leadership position, feel as though they have one arm tied behind their back.
They just never fully feel that they have total control in a way that they’d like. Which brings us to the question – what can you do about it?
The easy fix answer which would ignore context is to say ‘untie the arm and grab that wheel with both hands’.
I’d like to suggest something a bit deeper than the quick fix. Solving constraints issue is often a time based challenge. Focusing on removing them can happen sooner or later but there is no magic wand. When I consult to Boards about this issue I centre on three core questions to help ‘unpack’ the extent to which an organisation is being led by a one armed leader:
1: ‘Have you an explicit and well articulated Vision of where you want to go?’
2: ‘Have you identified the top three or four barriers that currently or will likely impede your journey towards that destination?’
3: ‘Have you identified, explicitly, the capabilities you will need to have to address those barriers and whether or not those capabilities are available to you?’
If your organisation lacks a clear and articulated Vision it will never do much more than steer in circles. Most often however it will be pushed around by the tides of constraints and have minimal chance to steer a more direct and focused path.
If your organisation is unaware or has yet to consider the likely barriers then it is likely that even with a well articulated Vision, much energy (and resources) will be expended trying to push against immovable and invisible objects that prevent your progress.
If you have not identified the needed capabilities and whether or not you have them, then you will likely make calls upon your organisation that it just cannot deliver. The end result is the slow and ever certain draining of energy. It’s like the fire that is left to burn itself out whilst everyone dances around it. No one works out where the next lot of wood is or how to get it.
The reality for leaders in real world organisations is that constraints exist and no ‘do these things’ or develop this mentality’ can survive by ignoring the context for your specific organisation’s situation.
BUT
You can, by answering those three questions listed, see many of the constraints become part of the landscape and not the ‘success breakers’ they are often allowed to be.
Leading with one hand tied behind your back is a common requirement. Doing it well requires a clear and compelling organisational Vision, full situational awareness, and well grounded assessment of what is and isn’t possible given the capabilities you have available.
Ernst & Young and GreenBiz have completed a survey of business executives looking at the development of Corporate Sustainability around the world. The report shows that there has been a clear rise in awareness; that employees are a core source driving sustainability actions; that reduction of costs is a core appeal and that return on…
Read More >On the eve of ANZAC day here in Australia ABC Radio Darwin’s Vicki Kerrigan chats with futurist Marcus Barber on the future of war – what the future triggers of war might be and how war will be fought Increasing technology or less technology? Haves versus the have nots? On a pretty serious topic…
Read More >In this chat with Vicki Kerrigan on ABC Radio Darwin, we chat about workplace design and the need to create functional workplaces – something the ‘open-plan’ model fails utterly at delivering. Click on the link below Futurist Marcus Barber on ABC Radio Darwin discussing the future of workplace design and the challenges of dysfunctional workplaces…
Read More >Columbia University’s Earth Institute have just made publicly available their World Happiness Report, joining the expanding list of happiness reports emerging ultimately from Bhutan’s Happiness Index. There’s some interesting results in this one and some that you might expect were more obvious, like the idea that at a certain point, more money won’t make you…
Read More >Whilst the main thrust of Australian economic activity is said to be in the hands of the Federal Government, we should not overlook the significant role that Local Council Government’s can have. As the Federal Government wrestles with falling taxation revenues and an apparent inability to get the message across about distributing the income of…
Read More >Strategic Futurist Marcus Barber chats with Vicki Kerrigan on ABC Radio Darwin about the challenges facing the Northern Territory, the farming and mining sectors. In summing up the emerging signs of a clash between agricultural uses of land and land use for resource and mining needs, Marcus uses the phrase ‘Eat or Extract’ as the…
Read More >As most of you know I nominated this year as the 2012 International Year of Resilience because frankly, that’s what I reckon large chunks of the world need right now. The twitter feed is #2012YearofResilience. I sent a few of these tips out at the start of the year and have seen a few of…
Read More >A new city is due to emerge in Darwin over the coming couple of years and the key question is – what sort of attention is being paid to weather related disasters in the design phase? Paul Dale on ABC Radio Darwin chats with futurist Marcus Barber about planning and weather. You can download the…
Read More >Dorothea Mackellar’s poem ‘My Country’ is best known for its second verse – “I love a sunburnt country, A land of sweeping plains, Of ragged mountain ranges, Of droughts and flooding rains”. As vast tracts of Australia again face the prospect of massive floods I wonder if our Urban Planners ever consider the significance of…
Read More >Potentially the biggest area of untapped competitive advantage (and arguably one of the biggest areas where costs could be reduced) is within supply chains. Most approaches to Supply Chain Management are linear and isolated with one player trying to squeeze the other with no regard to the overall effect of the full supply chain. It’s…
Read More >