In the Ins of the Outs of Crowdsourcing
In tracking shifts across the world and across industries, the rise of Crowdsourcing continues to unleash some amazing innovations in products and services. Importantly it is exposing the capability gaps that even large organisations have. Simply put, the ‘crowd’ is always going to be bigger than your business or organisation. But to tap that latent capability effectively requires some mental (and occasionally structural) shifts. Here’s a few ideas you can jump onto today:
To garner any lasting benefits from Crowdsourcing, going ‘out there’ needs internal trust. Without that trust much energy will be expended by a few people, only to see potentially business changing ideas fall on to infertile soil. There are some key things that your organisation must understand when it moves toward tapping the crowd.
Bringing ideas in from the out needs a filtering process
1. All ideas are good, some are more good than others.
This means that you must have a formal acknowledgement system in place as in “thanks for your idea, there’s some good merit in it and we might be able to apply it at some point but not right now”
Other ideas need a more direct response “thanks for your idea, at the moment we can’t see a place for it in our existing portfolio”
And some ideas require you to make a direct phone call or note of thanks to start a more involved conversations and relationship. These would usually be ideas that have immediate applicability. Regardless of the immediate benefits or otherwise, building a relationship of respect and trust requires you to acknowledge the thinking and input of people from the crowd. As many organizations have discovered to their horror – crowds talk and negative talk can suddenly become a public relations disaster. You must treat your Crowd like any other valued member of your organisation’s team.
2. Crowd sourcing offers organisations like yours a chance to build a testbed case.
It is an opportunity to try concepts out that crowd has provided to you. There are 2 main ways I recommend:
A) try a crowd sourced idea in a safe area that has a low-cost of resources and process change or
B) try a crowd sourced idea with one of your organisation’s intractable problems.
In the 1st idea you are looking to apply the concept where you have low-cost of people and low-cost process. With low-cost of people this includes time, money, and available support to enact the idea that’s been brought in from the outside. The challenge for organisations is automatically jumping to action on any new crowdsourced idea that looks interesting which is why the filtering process is critical. Instead your organisation must always balance the implementation of an idea with the Capabilities available to it.
With the 2nd approach, you utilise the Capabilities of the crowd to generate solutions to problems that you have been unable to solve yourself. The outstanding example of the Foldit! Community solving the enzyme challenge for HIV is one well-known impact of effective crowdsourcing.
So what key Crowdsourcing components are needed?
The initial phase requires your organisational management to accept the possibility of talking to the outside world. Where crowdsourcing enables you to access a whole range of capabilities, it is often the internal barrier of approval to access the outside ideas, that prevents the full benefits of crowdsourcing being available to your organisation.
In my innovation workshops I usually discuss the idea of “permission to change”. This is an explicit statement of intention within the organisation that enables people to pursue something different, in different ways, and for different outcomes. Without that explicit permission to change, crowdsourcing initiatives will likely fail. This is why utilising the ‘safe area’ is the easiest step for organisations to take in their crowdsourcing journey.
It is also useful to understand that very few organisations are starting from scratch. If your organisation has outsourced any of its productive capacity and built a supply chain or network of relationships through that process, or in-sourced some capability through temporary and contractor hiring, it is likely you already have the key basic building blocks for moving towards a crowdsourcing approach.
In both instances, your organisation has established an ability to talk to the outside world and rely on the outside world to produce something you require. The difference between crowdsourcing and normal reliance on a selected contractor or part of the supply chain, is that the crowd is much bigger, much wider and has much greater capability. Because of that increased capacity, management of crowdsourcing can seem daunting at first, but there’s really no need for it to be any different than how you would approach a typical supplier arrangement.
So where to begin?
Take a thumb sketch view of your organisation’s ability to call for assistance, speak to, and relate with, the outside world.
Next, ensure that you have a ready platform that allows you to ask for and respond to ideas. If you already have a social media platform, it is likely you have the skill sets you require to tap the ever growing capabilities of crowdsourcing.
Be clear on which approach you plan to take and ensure that you have the explicit ‘permission to change’ or ‘permission to crowdsource’ statements widely distributed and understood across your organisation.
Finally, set realistic expectations from your initial crowdsourcing endeavours. You may hit a home run on your first attempt, however it is more likely that in the initial stages you will be building up your internal and external capability to understand how crowdsourcing can become a source of innovation, change and evolution for your business.
And one final word of caution: the crowd ‘outside’ probably thinks very differently from how you think – that difference is neither good nor bad, just different. You will learn as much from the crowd, as the crowd can learn from you. Your key challenge is to begin
Futurists often get asked things like ‘Okay then – who’s going to win the ‘flag’ this year’. In Melbourne Cup time most of my friends ring me asking for a hot tip. Given my consistent poor form at selecting a winner, why they would ask me is anyone’s guess (unless they are working out who…
Read More >Does your organisation suffer what Futurists call ‘Operational Sleepwalking’? That most organisations (and people) willingly sleepwalk their way into their futures is not all that surprising. What is surprising about that however is that those people and those organisations are: * Surprised when something unexpected (and not to their liking) happens and, * Claim they…
Read More >Maree Conway, of ‘University Futures’ has joined the Australian Strategic Planning Institute as a lead facilitator for the Institute’s programs. Maree’s experience in policy development, planning and strategy initiatives provides additional weight to the sessions on offer. TASPI now have three key facilitators that cover critical steps in the Strategic Planning Process – Enhanced Awareness…
Read More >The latest edition of Fast Thinking has hit the streets and includes another tool for those seeking to develop innovation and strategy. Marcus Barber explains how to use, what he calls an ‘iiBubble’, a process that helps capture an idea to see if it has innovation ‘legs’. As one of the tools unique to Barber…
Read More >Looking Up Feeling Good would like to wish the very talented and focused futurist, Sophie Barber a happy birthday today. Sophie’s amazing talent at suggesting the possible future for a positive outcome is a true inspiration and we look forward to many more insights as the complexity of challenges continues to test our understanding, commitment…
Read More >The CoreNet Global Melbourne 2007 Summit incorporated a thought provoking Hypothetical panel discussion on the future of corporate real estate and the drivers for sustainability. With an economic futures framework provided by Melbourne University Professor of Economics Neville Norman who moderated the discussion, the panel included Aggie Aitken, Head of Workplace Development at ANZ; Strategic…
Read More >Among other great articles, the winter 2007 edition of Fast Thinking magazine highlights the ‘8 Factor’ model for effective employee engagement, created by strategic futurist Marcus Barber. Using the model he shows how organisations can develop greater flexibility when it comes to providing incentives as a means for improving productivity and ensuring longevity for staff.…
Read More >Last night the ABC program ‘A Difference of Opinion’ looked at the issues of the housing affordability ciris. The panel provided some quality perspectives as to what was causing the challenge and what kind of actions might need to occur in order to address the issue with Ross Gittins’ early observation that the debate completely…
Read More >Dan Atkins, former manager of Environmental policy at Toyota and now Director of Sustainable Business Practises and Strategic Futurist Marcus Barber will speak at the South East Networks / VicUrban Business Breakfast at the Sandown Racecourse on Wednesday the 27th of June. Both Dan (who’ll discuss how Toyota applies its Environmental Policy in order to…
Read More >Looking Up Feeling Good’s advanced signals reporting service ‘Future Alerts’ is now available as a monthly subscription offering. Designed to provide your organisation with signals indicating potential change, each report comes with analysis of the signals and how they might impact your business. Applying some advanced Environmental Scanning process, including the ‘VSTEEP’ model, you can…
Read More >